Defence Tech Capital Brief

Issue 009 · 1–8 October 2026 · Prepared 8 October 2026

This is the web edition. The PDF edition adds the deal table and an evidence grade on every factual claim. It is available on request: research@pal-berg.com.

Executive Analysis

In Ukraine, the area where cheap drones can find and kill almost anything is expanding outward from the front line. Defending against weapons like these is expensive, and that cost is now shaping where governments and investors put money on both sides of the Atlantic.

The kill zone is getting deeper.

Ukrainian commanders use "kill zone" for the strip on each side of the front where constant drone surveillance and strike make almost any movement of vehicles or troops lethal. Officials and units have put its typical depth at 15 to 25 km on each side since March, varying by sector.

Robert Brovdi, who commands Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, put it at 25 km or more in May. He measures depth by how often and how densely strikes land, using Ukraine's own battlefield data, so the figure describes sustained coverage, a higher bar than the reach of any single drone. Davyd Aloian, a deputy secretary of Ukraine's National Security and Defence Council, has cited 50 km in some areas.

The trend runs one way. President Zelensky put the depth at 10 to 20 km in a September 2025 interview. On 7 August ISW reported a brigade near Kupyansk saying its sector had widened from about 15 to 25 km, and in July the commander of the 7th Rapid Reaction Corps, in the Pokrovsk sector, expects 30 km by year-end.

All of these figures come from Ukrainian officials and units; we found no independent measurement. ISW assesses that the zone has largely stopped both sides from massing infantry or armour for a breakthrough. Tanks and other expensive equipment struggle to survive inside it.

[CHART PLACEHOLDER: Fig. 01, Ukraine's drone kill zone is getting deeper]

Beyond the front, strikes now reach refineries.

Ukraine reports its drone strikes by distance band. In June its drone forces flew 2,747 missions at 25 to 150 km, 3,406 at 150 to 300 km and 2,359 at 500 to 2,000 km, and Brovdi said strikes deep inside Russia had risen 1,150% since January. Mid-range missions now outnumber close-range ones. Cheap weapons that can strike persistently now have a near edge of tens of kilometres and a far edge of thousands.

Defending against cheap weapons is expensive, and this week's money followed that cost.

On published estimates, a Patriot PAC-3 interceptor costs 27 to 140 times as much as the Shahed-type attack drones it is often fired at. In one week, interceptor awards to incumbent manufacturers carried about $45B in headline value, little of it obligated (detail in Top Signal). Private and European money went after the cost itself: Blackstone's new interceptor-components company Falcata, Benchmark's seed investment in interceptor start-up Furientis, and Germany's financing of tens of thousands of Ukrainian-built interceptor drones.

This is the exquisite-versus-attritable divide in practice. Exquisite systems are expensive, built in small numbers and meant to last; attritable systems are cheap enough to lose in volume, and their value is best measured as cost per successful mission. The incumbents are being paid to make more of the expensive interceptor. The entrants are betting buyers will pay for a lower cost per successful intercept.

The cost gap persists because cheaper counter-drone defences are not yet fielded at scale. In the US and across Europe, counter-UAS (C-UAS) systems built for this threat, such as guns, jammers, directed energy and interceptor drones, are still in development, testing or early deployment. Until they reach volume, militaries defending against massed drones fall back on missiles designed for aircraft and ballistic threats, spending them at a rate production cannot replace. That depletion is what the week's multiyear interceptor awards are paying to refill.

The US and Europe are buying for different reasons.

The US has more strategic depth than any other buyer, with oceans between it and its main adversaries, yet it wrote the largest cheques, because the Iran war has drained its interceptor stocks. A July chart from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) put US Patriot interceptor stocks at 759 to 827, from about 2,330 before the war: a fall of roughly two-thirds on our arithmetic.

Europe is buying because the threat is close. Kaliningrad, Russia's exclave between Poland and Lithuania, puts Russian strike systems inside NATO's own geography, and future US commitments are harder to predict. Brovdi has urged the Baltic states to build their own drone kill zone along their borders with Russia and Belarus.

Demand driven by depletion follows expenditure and can ease when fighting stops. Demand driven by proximity follows geography and persists. That difference matters when weighing US against European exposure. The same proximity logic applies in the Indo-Pacific, where Chinese missiles can reach much of the allied basing network; this issue carries no evidence on that theatre.

Urgency is changing how governments pay.

When capacity has to grow faster than budgets allow, risk shifts to private balance sheets. Anduril is spending $3.7B of its own money on a submarine-parts yard that the Navy pays for only as parts are delivered. Shield AI is matching the Navy dollar for dollar on its X-BAT autonomous jet.

Governments also want a share of the upside. The Pentagon's lending arm, the Office of Strategic Capital (OSC), has offered chipmaker Wolfspeed a $1.5B loan that comes with warrants, rights to buy up to 7.5% of the company's shares. The President has claimed a 40% public stake in Anduril's yard; press reports describe a minority stake in a new subsidiary, with no amount disclosed. With one documented case this is an early pattern, and we grade the link between urgency and these financing structures as assessed, low-to-moderate confidence.

In Europe, capital is arriving faster than companies can absorb it.

European defence start-ups have raised a record $7.4B this year, more than 85% of it in mega-rounds, and two Munich-area companies, Helsing and Quantum Systems, are together valued at $25.7B.

The clearest sign of a thin company base is where the money goes next. German capital is reaching into Ukraine. Berlin is financing Quantum Systems' joint venture with Ukraine's WIY Drones, and this week's Kyiv visit produced agreements pairing Quantum with Fire Point, Helsing with Culver Aerospace, and ARX Robotics with Roboneers. Europe is importing capability from the continent's deepest drone industry. Proving that capital is outrunning supply would need deal-count data, which we do not have.

Top Signal

Three US interceptor programmes received multiyear commitments in one week.

All went to incumbents, and much of the headline value is not yet firm.

Patriot, bought component by component.

The PAC-3 MSE is the newest interceptor for the Patriot air-defence system, built mainly to stop ballistic and cruise missiles. On 5 October Boeing said Lockheed Martin, the missile's prime contractor, had awarded it a seven-year subcontract worth about $14.7B to triple output of the seeker, the guidance unit that steers the interceptor onto its target.

A 29 July modification took Lockheed's own contract for complete missiles to a cumulative ceiling of $58.62B, with nothing obligated at award, and L3Harris took a $4.7B subcontract for the propulsion in September. All three serve a January framework to lift PAC-3 output from about 600 to 2,000 missiles a year. The Boeing award is undefinitized: work starts before price and quantity are agreed, so the $14.7B can move once terms are set.

Two Raytheon missiles for the Navy and missile defence.

On 1 October the Navy awarded Raytheon an SM-6 contract worth up to $24.4B over five years, with two option years. The SM-6 is a ship-launched missile that can intercept aircraft, cruise missiles and some ballistic missiles, and can also strike ships.

On 7 October the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) awarded Raytheon a noncompetitive, multi-year undefinitized contract (HQ0851-27-C-E001) for complete SM-3 Block IB interceptors, which destroy short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in midcourse, above the atmosphere. Both Raytheon awards build on seven-year production frameworks signed with the Pentagon in February. Neither discloses quantities.

The Missile Defense Agency obligates about 10% of a $4.4B interceptor contract up front to Raytheon.

The SM-3 award is worth $4.43B in base value and $6.34B with options, yet only $454.2M of FY2026 money, about 10% of the base, is obligated (legally committed) at signing. Work runs to October 2034 in Tucson and Huntsville. The MDA had proposed ending SM-3 Block IB purchases in its FY2025 budget; Congress then funded six more, and MDA's FY2027 request seeks up to 78.

Press figures put a Block IB at $10–15M, so the base value would buy roughly 300 to 440 missiles. Militarnyi reported, citing Defense Archives, output of three to four a month against a ceiling of five, or roughly 290 to 480 over eight years. The ranges overlap, which suggests the contract is sized to the existing production line with no increase priced in (assessed, low-to-moderate confidence).

Incumbents hold the volume.

Every large interceptor award since July has gone to an incumbent: PAC-3, AMRAAM (the standard US air-to-air missile), SM-6 and now SM-3. AMRAAM was sole-source and SM-3 noncompetitive; the notices do not state how PAC-3 and SM-6 were competed. The largest subcontracts, Boeing's seeker and L3Harris's propulsion, also went to incumbents. For new entrants, the open lane this quarter is development work, such as Ursa Major's rocket-motor awards (assessed, moderate confidence).

What the cost estimates show.

Published unit costs disagree. Defense News puts a PAC-3 at about $4M and an Iranian Shahed drone at $35,000 on average; Tectonic puts a PAC-3 at $4–5M and newer Shahed and Russian Geran variants at under $150,000. On either set of numbers, the interceptor costs 27 to 140 times its target. PAC-3 is designed for ballistic and cruise missiles, so the ratio measures the cost of firing the wrong interceptor at a drone. That mismatch is the gap low-cost interceptors aim to close.

[CHART PLACEHOLDER: Fig. 02, One Patriot interceptor costs about as much as 114 Shahed drones]

The private bet on cheaper intercepts.

Blackstone launched Falcata on 1 October by buying two firms that make guidance, navigation and sensing components for interceptors. Bloomberg reports more than $1B of debt and equity committed, citing unnamed sources; Blackstone has not disclosed a figure. Lockheed led a $50M round in counter-drone company Fortem that closed on 30 September. Furientis is covered under Capital and Germany's interceptor-drone financing under Ukraine in Focus.

Bottom line · Assessed, moderate confidence

Government multiyear commitments and private capital both assume demand for intercepts will outrun supply through the decade. The private bets also assume cost per successful intercept will fall. The grade would rise if any buyer published a unit price for a low-cost interceptor at volume, and fall if the PAC-3 and SM-3 contracts are finalised below framework quantities.

Ukraine in Focus

With Defender Media

Germany finances Ukraine-built interceptor drones; Merz's visit produces €8.5B in headline agreements.

Chancellor Merz arrived in Kyiv on 4 October with a package of more than €1.3B: about €1B of military aid and about €350M for energy repairs. The military portion includes financing for Quantum WIY Industries, the joint venture between German drone maker Quantum Systems and Ukraine's WIY Drones, to build "several tens of thousands" of interceptor drones in Ukraine. We found no model, unit price or contract value.

President Zelensky said Ukraine signed 15 agreements and documents with the German side, many of them company-level, worth more than €8.5B. Reported items include a Quantum Systems–Fire Point memorandum, a Helsing–Culver Aerospace letter of intent on long-range strike, a Roboneers–ARX Robotics strategic partnership on ground drones, and a framework on 25/40 mm air-defence and 155 mm artillery systems. Diehl signed memoranda on IRIS-T systems and missiles; the "thousands" of missiles reported in the press does not appear in official accounts.

Assessment · Moderate confidence

About €1.3B of the total is itemised funding. The remaining €7B or so is memoranda, letters of intent and frameworks, which commit the parties only to negotiate. The lasting signal is the industrial model: Berlin pays for production inside Ukraine through a German-Ukrainian joint venture, which gives the German partner combat-tested designs and gives Ukrainian output a Western financing channel. Quantum's National Guard orders total 25,000: 15,000 in March and a further 10,000 in September. These may overlap with this week's figure and should not be added to it.

Buntar Aerospace raises $16M.

Kyiv-based Buntar Aerospace, founded by Ivan Kaunov, Bohdan Sas and Kateryna Bezsudna, raised $16M (€14.3M) in a round led by Freedom Fund and an undisclosed international private equity fund, with Gardar (Norway), Iron Wolf Capital (Lithuania) and Autonomy Capital participating. Total funding is now about $30M. Proceeds go to product development, production capacity, hiring and Buntar Copilot, its AI software that supports drone operators' decisions in combat.

Buntar-3, a reconnaissance drone that takes off vertically, was unveiled in May 2025 with 3.5 hours of flight and an 80 km range; December 2025 materials list 4 hours and 100 km, with target detection at up to 15 km and operation without GPS. Defender Media reported in March Buntar's account that a Buntar-3 helped direct a missile strike on a Russian Shahed storage and launch site at Donetsk airport. A remote-control feature followed in July.

For scale, AVentures Capital estimates Ukrainian defence tech raised at least $129M in grants and equity in 2025. This single round equals about an eighth of that floor.

F-Drones wins a Pentagon reorder for delivering on time, while Ukrainian jammers set the test.

The US military is buying 1,320 more F10 strike drones from Ukraine's F-Drones under Drone Dominance, the Pentagon's programme to buy small attack drones in volume. The F10 is an FPV (first-person-view) drone, a small attack drone flown by an operator through its camera feed. Delivery is planned by the end of November, and the order depends on Kyiv issuing an export permit the company is still seeking.

F-Drones says the unit price matches its first order. The official tracker lists the 1,320 as a bonus order under Gauntlet I, the programme's first competitive buying round, which priced bonus units at $5,000 each. That puts the order at about $6.6M. F-Drones sells in the US through UDD Tech Corp, sixth of Gauntlet I's 11 order recipients, and shipped 2,000 F10s in July. The company says that was the first time Ukraine authorised the export of finished Ukrainian combat drones.

UDD entered the second round, Gauntlet II, and did not place in either top five. Skycutter, flying a drone developed by Ukraine's SkyFall, placed fourth in Deep Strike; reports of a second Ukrainian top-five finisher are unverified. Two Ukrainian electronic-warfare (EW) makers, Unwave and Phantom Defense, say they supplied jamming for the Gauntlet II test environment. Unwave says three EW makers took part, so on company accounts at least two were Ukrainian.

Assessment · Low-to-moderate confidence

A bonus order to a vendor that missed the latest round's top five indicates the Pentagon weighs on-time delivery alongside test results; Gauntlet I rules give early delivery primary consideration. For a $5,000 attritable drone that is the right weighting: the drone that arrives on schedule and survives jamming is the one that completes the mission, and test rank is only a proxy for that. The US is also using Ukrainian electronic warfare to set the bar for its own drone tests, which makes Ukrainian battlefield conditions the reference standard for US small-drone buying. This rests on one order; the grade rises if higher-ranked Gauntlet I winners go without follow-on orders.

Tax relief on defence inputs is now law.

Laws 4967-IX and 4968-IX, adopted on 3 September and signed on 15 September, took effect on 17 September. Producers importing components to build weapons, drones, electronic-warfare and reconnaissance systems for Ukraine's defence forces are exempt from VAT and import duty; the laws do not expressly address production paid for by a foreign state. The exemption applies only where the end recipient is a Ukrainian defence body, so it does not cover output built for export.

Fedorov's defence-tech fund has still not launched.

Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine's defence minister from January to July 2026, announced the fund on 31 August and said on 9 September that resources had been secured for what he called Ukraine's largest defence-tech venture fund. We searched Ukrainian and English coverage through 8 October and found no name, size, manager or launch date. His separate "Army of Robots" initiative, announced 26 September, names only an unnamed large private technology company as developer.

EDGE–Fire Point: the antitrust window is open.

UAE state-owned EDGE Group proposed buying 30% of Ukrainian missile maker Fire Point for about $760M, implying a $2.5B valuation. Fire Point's founder said in April that Ukraine's Antimonopoly Committee had until about October to decide, and in May that the company would most likely refuse the deal. He has suggested a valuation near $6B. The contested range is therefore $2.5B (EDGE's offer) to about $6B (the founder's figure). We found no development between 1 and 8 October.

The Round

The week's remaining deals, awards and financings, numbered from 02; Top Signal is 01.

02 · Anduril will spend $3.7B of its own money building a submarine-parts yard in Maryland.

$3.7B own capital · Pay on output · US Navy, up to $2.9B · Source: Company, Reuters

On 6 October Anduril announced Arsenal-2 at Sparrows Point, Maryland, the former Bethlehem Steel site. The yard will cover more than 2 million square feet on 187 acres and make components for the Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine, supplying the two shipyards that build it, General Dynamics Electric Boat and HII's Newport News. Torpedo tubes come first, then bows, sterns and larger hull sections. Hiring starts in 2029 and operations in 2030.

The Navy contract is worth up to $2.9B, with payments tied to demonstrated production. Maryland and Baltimore County would match up to 13% of Anduril's investment, about $481M, partly through appropriations that still need legislative approval; county officials value a pending 30-year property-tax credit at up to $210M. A senior administration official, speaking anonymously, projected 9 million added labour hours a year, roughly 15% more submarine-building capacity.

President Trump said taxpayers would receive a 40% stake in the yard. No filing, contract notice or company statement gave terms through 8 October; Defense One and Fox News reported a minority, non-control stake in a new Anduril shipyard subsidiary under Defense Production Act and industrial-base authorities, with no amount disclosed. For scale, Arsenal-2 is about 3.7 times Anduril's nearly $1B Arsenal-1 manufacturing plant in Ohio, and the company is separately building a California facility for Virginia-class parts. A day earlier Anduril announced an Army command-and-control contract worth up to $1.8B over five years.

Assessment · Moderate confidence

Because the Navy pays for delivered parts, Anduril carries the construction and schedule risk on a site that will produce nothing before 2030. Traditionally the government pays to stand up new capacity. The company best known for cheap autonomous systems is now financing the supply chain of one of the most exquisite platforms in the US inventory. If the 40% stake becomes real equity, the government would co-own a privately financed asset; that reading stays low-confidence until terms appear.

03 · Ursa Major wins $137M of Navy rocket-motor work while its stock-market listing is pending.

$137M · Development, 2 awards · US Navy · Source: Company release

The Navy awarded Ursa Major two contracts: $91M for a 7-inch solid rocket motor for the Compact Air-to-Air Missile and $46M for a 10-inch motor for the medium-range Naval Modular Missile. Both awards fund development and qualification, the testing a motor must pass before it can be bought in production.

The timing matters for the listing. In August Ursa Major agreed to go public by merging with Bleichroeder Acquisition Corp. III, a SPAC, at about $1.6B before the deal and $2.3B after it. Investors committed at least $350M in a PIPE, a private share placement alongside the listing, with about $110M funded at signing. Closing is targeted for Q1 2027 on Nasdaq.

Assessment · Moderate confidence

The new work is about 3.9 times the $35M of Ursa Major's earlier Navy development awards, $12.5M of which was its own matching money, and it lands while SPAC shareholders decide whether to redeem their shares or hold at a $2.3B valuation. Rocket motors are the binding constraint on US munitions output, and the Navy is now paying a second source on two new programmes. The company claims low unit cost but has published no price; cost per motor at rate is what would justify the valuation.

04 · Shield AI and the Navy each add $150M to X-BAT.

$150M + $150M · OTA modification · US Navy, 50% company · Source: Company release

On 8 October Shield AI said the Navy added $150M to its existing Other Transaction agreement for X-BAT, an AI-piloted jet that takes off and lands vertically, and that it will add $150M of its own. The Navy's money comes through the Defense Exportability Features programme, which pays to design export versions for allies from the start. With the August $50M award, also matched, commitments total $400M, half from the company. Defense One reports milestone-based payments, flight testing before the end of 2026 and early operational capability around 2029.

Assessment · Moderate confidence

Half of X-BAT's development money comes from Shield AI's own balance sheet, the same shift seen in Arsenal-2. Private valuations in the sector now carry co-investment obligations alongside revenue. The Information reported in September that Shield AI is in talks to raise at a valuation of at least $20B.

05 · OSC offers Wolfspeed $1.5B over 30 years, with warrants attached.

Up to $1.5B · Conditional loan, 30 yr · OSC, warrants ≤7.5% · Source: SEC 8-K

On 7 October Wolfspeed (NYSE: WOLF) disclosed a conditional commitment from the Office of Strategic Capital, the Pentagon unit that lends to critical supply chains, for a secured loan of up to $1.5B to be drawn in stages. The money supports US production of silicon carbide and gallium nitride. Both are wide-bandgap semiconductors, which handle higher power and frequencies than silicon and are used in radar, electronic warfare and communications. Radiation-hardened parts are included.

The filing sets up to four tranches, a 30-year maturity, a 36-month window to draw funds and a $750M minimum contribution from Wolfspeed, which can include new equity, excess cash and converted debt. The government receives warrants for up to 7.5% of fully diluted equity as tranches fund. The first $600M would refinance secured notes due in 2030. Diligence, definitive agreements and approvals are outstanding. Reuters reported a 27% after-hours rise; the gain did not hold on 8 October.

Assessment · Moderate confidence

If the first draw refinances existing debt, the immediate effect is balance-sheet repair. New capacity depends on later tranches and on Wolfspeed raising $750M itself. The OSC is offering long-dated government debt in exchange for a share of the equity upside. Together with the 40% stake claimed in Arsenal-2, this is the second case this week of the government seeking ownership in a supplier it also buys from. Anyone in those capital structures now has to factor the government into dilution and recovery analysis.

Also tracked

A small-cap drone acquisition ties part of its price to earn-outs. On 7 October Beam Global (Nasdaq: BEEM) agreed to buy Norwegian drone maker ScoutDI for a base price of about $24.0M, 90% in cash and 10% in Beam shares. The sellers receive full earn-out payments, deferred consideration tied to performance, only if ScoutDI's 2026 and 2027 revenue reaches 150% and 160% of 2025 levels. Closing is expected in November.

The Pentagon starts FY2027 on a stopgap. A continuing resolution, a temporary law that holds spending at last year's levels, funds the government to 11 December. It generally bars new programme starts and production increases, the two things scaling hardware companies most need.

EU defence loans keep converting to cash. SAFE (Security Action for Europe) is the EU's €150B loan instrument for defence procurement. It caps component costs from outside the EU, EEA-EFTA and Ukraine at 35% and treats Ukrainian production as eligible. Romania, which received €2.5B of its €16.68B loan as pre-financing on 26 August, can file its first milestone-linked payment request this month.

Capital

European defence venture funding is at a record, and two Munich companies dominate it.

Dealroom and Resilience Media's State of Defence Tech report, published 5 October, puts European defence start-up funding at $7.4B as of 20 September, against $1.5B a year earlier. It forecasts $10.5B for 2026, about four times last year's $2.6B. Mega-rounds account for more than 85% of the total.

Germany leads at $3.5B, followed by Finland ($1.2B), the UK ($932M) and France ($376M). Dealroom values Helsing and Quantum Systems together at $25.7B. Drones and autonomous systems take 74% of EU and 77% of UK defence funding, against 57% in the US; ground robotics has raised $77.6M. Across NATO countries, defence start-ups have raised $27.1B this year, with $38.5B forecast by December.

[CHART PLACEHOLDER: Fig. 03, European defence venture funding is on track to quadruple]

Assessment · Moderate confidence

The median European round is far smaller than the headline suggests. Later-stage European drone and autonomy companies will be priced against two valuations, whether or not the comparison fits. European exposure is concentrated in one segment, while ground robotics remains thinly funded relative to its use in Ukraine.

Furientis raises a $25M seed and wins its first funded Pentagon agreement for a 100-mile interceptor.

Furientis, a Los Angeles company founded in 2025, announced on 6 October a $25M seed round led by Benchmark, with partner Chetan Puttagunta joining the board. Tectonic reports it is Benchmark's first investment in a pure defence company. Furientis also disclosed its first funded government contract, a prototyping Other Transaction agreement (OTA) with the Department of War to develop a 100-mile (160 km) interceptor missile for homeland defence. We found no contract value or schedule.

The company's stated targets are a price under $250,000 per interceptor, 1,000 interceptors per factory per year and final assembly in under an hour. It makes its own solid rocket motors and uses automotive-grade airframe parts and commercial electronics. The CEO says the company flight-tests every few weeks, has "already demonstrated some intercepts" and recently completed a low-cost interceptor test at White Sands.

Assessment · Low-to-moderate confidence

Furientis is pricing itself against incumbent production rates. A target of 1,000 a year from one factory compares with about 600 PAC-3s a year from Lockheed's entire line today and 2,000 planned, at roughly a sixteenth to a twentieth of an estimated $4–5M PAC-3, though the two missiles serve different threats. These are design targets, and the distance between test claims and fielded performance is where the company will be priced. A $125M valuation has been reported by one outlet. The grade rises with independent test data or a disclosed OTA value.

The week's other venture rounds were mid-sized.

Gallatin AI, which builds logistics-planning software for the military, raised a $50M Series A with 8VC and Silent Ventures participating. Ukraine's Buntar Aerospace raised $16M (see Ukraine in Focus). We searched company releases and US, European and Ukrainian trade coverage for 1–8 October and found one round of $100M or more: Armadin's $255.5M Series B on 1 October, for AI cybersecurity with government customers and In-Q-Tel backing, which we exclude as dual-use; Asia-Pacific and Nordic coverage was incomplete.

On the Sourcing

Most deal values this week are company-reported and become documented only when a filing or contract notice appears. SM-3 figures are from the 8 October Pentagon contracts list. Falcata's $1B rests on Bloomberg's unnamed sources. The 40% Arsenal-2 stake is a presidential statement without formal terms. The €8.5B total is Zelensky's figure and mixes funding with non-binding documents. Unit costs for PAC-3, SM-3 and Shahed are press estimates and disagree, so we give ranges. Kill-zone depths are Ukrainian official and unit figures with no independent measurement. Wolfspeed's 27% after-hours rise did not hold.

Glossary

Attritable / exquisite. Attritable systems are cheap enough to lose in volume and are best valued by cost per successful mission. Exquisite systems are expensive, low-volume and built to last.

C2 (command and control). The systems commanders use to direct forces; Anduril's Army award is for the Army's next-generation version.

Continuing resolution (CR). A temporary US spending law that holds funding at the prior year's levels and generally bars new programmes and production increases.

Definitization / undefinitized contract. An undefinitized contract lets work start before price and quantity are agreed. Definitization is the point when those terms are fixed.

Drone Dominance / Gauntlet. The Pentagon's programme to buy small attack drones in volume. Gauntlet rounds are its competitive trials, which double as buying rounds.

Earn-out. Part of an acquisition price paid later, only if the acquired business hits agreed targets.

EW (electronic warfare). Jamming, spoofing and detecting enemy signals, including the radio links drones depend on.

FPV (first-person-view) drone. A small attack drone flown by an operator through its onboard camera.

ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance). Collecting information on enemy forces; Buntar-3 is an ISR drone.

ISW (Institute for the Study of War). A Washington think tank publishing daily assessments of the war in Ukraine.

Kill zone. The strip on each side of the front where persistent drone surveillance and strike make almost any movement lethal.

Mega-round. A very large venture financing round, commonly $100M or more.

MDA (Missile Defense Agency). The Pentagon agency responsible for ballistic-missile defence, including the SM-3.

Obligated funds. Money legally committed under a contract, as distinct from its ceiling value.

OSC (Office of Strategic Capital). The Pentagon unit that lends to companies in critical defence supply chains.

OTA (Other Transaction agreement). A flexible US contracting route outside standard procurement rules, widely used for prototypes.

PAC-3 MSE. The newest interceptor for the Patriot air-defence system, built mainly to stop ballistic and cruise missiles.

PIPE (private investment in public equity). Shares sold privately to investors alongside a listing or to an already-listed company.

SAFE (Security Action for Europe). The EU's €150B loan instrument for member-state defence procurement.

Seeker. The sensor and guidance unit that steers a missile onto its target.

Shahed / Geran. Iranian-designed one-way attack drones; Geran is the Russian-built version.

Sole-source. A contract awarded to one supplier without competition.

SM-3 Block IB. A ship- or land-launched interceptor that destroys short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles above the atmosphere.

SM-6. A ship-launched missile that can intercept aircraft, cruise missiles and some ballistic missiles, and can also strike ships.

SPAC (special purpose acquisition company). A listed shell company formed to merge with a private company and take it public.

Strategic depth. The distance between a country's core territory and its adversaries, which buys time and space in a conflict.

Warrants. Rights to buy a company's shares at a set price, giving the holder a share of any upside.

Wide-bandgap semiconductors. Chips made from materials such as silicon carbide and gallium nitride that handle higher power and frequencies than silicon, used in radar, EW and power systems.

Notices

No investment advice. This brief is published for information only. It is not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or to enter into any transaction. Nothing in it constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security or interest in any fund. Readers should obtain their own professional advice before acting on anything set out here.

Assessments and forward-looking statements. Content marked ASSESSMENT is our interpretation, distinguished from the underlying record by design. Confidence marks describe how far the cited evidence carries the specific claim they follow, not a probability. Forward-looking statements are estimates subject to change and to risks outside our control; actual outcomes may differ materially.

Sources and accuracy. The brief draws on public filings, contract notices, company and firm statements, third-party trackers and our own research. Third-party information has not been independently verified and is reproduced as reported, with its source named. Figures described as company-reported or firm-reported are unverified at the date of publication. Statements are current as at the date of the issue and are not updated.

Interests, confidentiality and rights. Palisade Bergschrund, its partners and its clients may hold, advise on or transact in interests connected to companies named here; no position is implied by inclusion. The brief is confidential and provided for the named recipient's internal use. It may not be redistributed, published or quoted without written consent. © 2026 Palisade Bergschrund. No liability is accepted for loss arising from reliance on this brief.

Legal Disclaimers

General Disclaimer. This document, and Palisade Bergschrund Corporation's ("Pal-Berg's") research, analysis, validation, testing, and advisory materials, are provided for general informational and evaluation purposes only, are subject to change, and do not constitute legal, regulatory, tax, accounting, investment banking, broker-dealer, placement agent, investment advisory, procurement, technical, operational, or military advice. This document is not a legal opinion, regulatory assessment, procurement advice, financial advice, or recommendation regarding any particular market-entry, transaction, teaming, licensing, investment, export-control, CFIUS, FOCI, facility-clearance, funding, or government-contracting strategy. Pal-Berg does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, future applicability, operational effectiveness, regulatory approval, procurement approval, financing outcome, investment outcome, transaction outcome, product performance, fitness for a particular purpose, or commercial success of any technology, product, company, market, or opportunity discussed. Pal-Berg makes no warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or fitness for a particular purpose of its research. Pal-Berg shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special, or punitive damages arising from the use or reliance upon this Research, including but not limited to loss of life, personal injury, property damage, or mission failure. Any reliance on Pal-Berg materials is at the recipient's own risk and should be made only in connection with the applicable agreement, statement of work, and the recipient's own independent technical, legal, regulatory, operational, and business judgment and advice from qualified counsel and other professional advisors.

Legal, Regulatory, Procurement, and Export-Control Matters. Statements regarding U.S. defense procurement, domestic-preference requirements, FOCI, CFIUS, export controls, cybersecurity requirements, funding programs, facility clearances, teaming, subcontracting, licensing, or other regulatory matters are provided for general informational purposes only. These areas are fact-specific, change frequently, and may depend on the recipient's jurisdiction, ownership, product classification, customer, transaction structure, end use, end user, funding source, and other facts. Recipients should consult qualified legal, regulatory, export-control, procurement, tax, accounting, and other professional advisors before taking action or making decisions based on this briefing.

No Product Warranty; Third-Party Products. Pal-Berg does not manufacture, design, own, sell, supply, maintain, warrant, or guarantee any third-party or customer products, systems, hardware, software, equipment, components, or technologies reviewed, tested, validated, researched, or discussed. Pal-Berg disclaims any warranty, express or implied, regarding such products, systems, hardware, software, equipment, components, or technologies, including any implied warranty of workmanship, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, safety, operational suitability, durability, or performance. Product-level claims, specifications, warranties, defects, failures, and compliance obligations remain solely the responsibility of the applicable manufacturer, supplier, owner, or customer, and Pal-Berg shall not be responsible for any losses, claims, damages, injuries, failures, or liabilities arising from or relating to such products, systems, hardware, software, equipment, components, or technologies, except to the extent expressly agreed in a written agreement signed by Pal-Berg.

Operational Decisions. Pal-Berg's services shall not be construed as operational, tactical, or strategic military advice. All operational decisions remain the sole responsibility of the commanding authority and designated decision-makers. Pal-Berg's research, analysis, validation, testing, and advisory materials are few inputs among many that should inform, but not solely determine, operational decisions.

No Government Endorsement. This document is not prepared, approved, endorsed, or sponsored by the U.S. Army, the U.S. Department of Defense, or any other government agency, military organization, prime contractor, or third-party organization referenced herein. References to third parties are for informational purposes only.

Palisade Bergschrund · Research, Data & Analytics · pal-berg.com · ascend@pal-berg.com

© 2026 Palisade Bergschrund Corporation. All rights reserved.